Norm Johnson joins
several residents affected by the changes in calling for a public
process and secondary review of the new flood plain maps, which the
NPCA suspended implementation of at its Jan. 18 meeting. Johnson, who
spoke before West Lincoln council at its Feb. 26 meeting, said he has
two main issues with the proposal. The first is that the report is
based on a number of questionable assumptions. His second concern is
the “autocratic” approach the NPCA took with the project.
“This proposal, in
my view, is very alarming,” said Johnson. “And the process
followed by the NPCA is disturbing.”
The new levels were
approved in March 2011 and the NPCA allowed a one-year transitional
period during which households in the expanded boundary would be able
to build. Residents, including Johnson, fear the changes will impact
their property values and insurance rates and will make it more
difficult to get building permits.
The water level at
Becket’s Bridge, which spans the Welland River on Regional Road 24,
is about 172 metres above sea level, Johnson said. During normal
flood times, the water will rise to about 174 metres. Following
Hurricane Hazel, which could be considered the storm of the century
Johnson said, the river reached a high of 174.65 metres.
At present, the
100-year flood mark, a line which represents the maximum extent of
flooding anticipated as a result of the storm of the century —
which has a one-per-cent chance of occurring each year — is 175.03
metres. The 100-year line also represents the point at which
development is not allowed. The new level jumps up a full metre from
the current level and up to 1.39 metres in parts of Wellandport. In
Wainfleet, 268 households, of about 2,800 in the township, will be
affected by the raised levels, Johnson told members of council. Johnson suspects more homes in West Lincoln will be affected
as the township houses a larger portion of the drainage system.
“In over 57 years,
we haven’t exceeded the Hurricane Hazel flood levels, let alone the
100-year flood lines,” Johnson said. “Remember, the 100-year line
does not guarantee freedom from flooding. It is a line representing a
one-per-cent chance of flooding in any given year. Given the
restrictions on residents along the river and the potential
implications for the community as a whole, this proposal needs public
input and review.”
Ald. John Glazier
asked how many hectares the new levels take out of production.
Johnson said the changes do not take land out of production per say,
but restrict what landowners are able to do with their properties.
Ald. Joanne Chechalk
questioned what role the township can play in the process, suggesting
that staff get in contact with the NPCA and come back with a report.
“I would really
like to hear more about this,” she said. “And how we got here.”
While Ald. Sue-Ellen
Merritt cannot argue with the NPCA’s defence that “determining
flood lines is an engineering exercise” and that “holding public
meetings would not change the scientific outcome of the modelling,”
she did question why affected land owners were not notified and what
the consultants used as a basis for the report. Mayor Douglas Joyner,
who sits on the NPCA board, said the answer to Merritt’s first
question was simple.
“The NPCA does not
have to inform people who live around the Welland River and
tributaries,” he said, explaining that it is the NPCA’s mandate
to protect the public from flooding.
Merritt, who said
she was “disappointed in the NPCA and the way it operates, added
the NPCA needs to change its policies to communicate more with
affected residents.
On Jan. 18, the NPCA
voted to downgrade the new levels to tentative status after meeting
with residents to discuss their concerns. “Staff have met with the
prime engineering consultant and asked that they conduct alternate
simplified analyses on certain areas of the system,” said Tony
D’Amario, CAO. “This additional work should validate the existing
and complex dynamic model that has been developed. We believe that
given the extent of the variances from the old to new levels, and the
concerns expressed by residents, that this additional check is
warranted before moving forward with implementation.”
In the interim,
individuals wishing to construct in the now tentative floodplain
expansion area are being advised of the pending levels and that they
should consider undertaking floodproofing measures in accordance with
the appended draft policy.
The NPCA has also
established a working committee comprised of board members and staff
to develop a process for implementing new regulatory levels for the
entire Welland River. The NPCA does not expect any new information
until the end of June.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for your comments.
The VDFRA does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that we have the right to reproduce, broadcast and publish those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever.